Range, F. & Marshall-Pescini, S. The Socio-Ecology of Free-Ranging Dogs. in Wolves and Dogs: between Myth and Science (eds. Range, F. & Marshall-Pescini, S.) 83–110 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022).
Pilot, M. et al. On the origin of mongrels: evolutionary history of free-breeding dogs in Eurasia. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282, 20152189 (2015).
Google Scholar
Parker, H. G. et al. Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science 304, 1160–1164 (2004).
Google Scholar
Calboli, F. C. F., Sampson, J., Fretwell, N. & Balding, D. J. Population structure and inbreeding from pedigree analysis of purebred dogs. Genetics 179, 593–601 (2008).
Google Scholar
Wayne, R. K. & von Holdt, B. M. Evolutionary genomics of dog domestication. Mamm. Genome 23, 3–18 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cadieu, E. et al. Coat variation in the domestic dog is governed by variants in three genes. Science 326, 150–153 (2009).
Google Scholar
Rimbault, M. & Ostrander, E. A. So many doggone traits: mapping genetics of multiple phenotypes in the domestic dog. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, R52–R57 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sutter, N. B. & Ostrander, E. A. Dog star rising: the canine genetic system. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 900–910 (2004).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Genomic selection analysis of morphological and adaptation traits in Chinese indigenous dog breeds. Front. Vet. Sci. 10, 1237780 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gojobori, J. et al. Japanese wolves are most closely related to dogs and share DNA with East Eurasian dogs. Nat. Commun. 15, 1680 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bergström, A. et al. Origins and genetic legacy of prehistoric dogs. Science 370, 557–564 (2020).
Google Scholar
Parker, H. G. Genomic analyses of modern dog breeds. Mamm. Genome 23, 19–27 (2012).
Google Scholar
Herzog, H. A., Bentley, R. A. & Hahn, M. W. Random drift and large shifts in popularity of dog breeds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271(Suppl 5), S353–S356 (2004).
Google Scholar
Thompson, D. Dog of the Decade: Breed Trends and What They Mean in America (McFarland, 2021).
Herzog, H. Forty-two Thousand and One Dalmatians: Fads, social contagion, and dog breed popularity. Soc. Anim. 14, 383–397 (2006).
Google Scholar
Mata, F. & Mata, A. Investigating the relationship between inbreeding and life expectancy in dogs: mongrels live longer than pure breeds. PeerJ 11, e15718 (2023).
Google Scholar
Donner, J. et al. Frequency and distribution of 152 genetic disease variants in over 100,000 mixed breed and purebred dogs. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007361 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yordy, J. et al. Body size, inbreeding, and lifespan in domestic dogs. Conserv. Genet. 21, 137–148 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kraus, C., Snyder-Mackler, N. & Promislow, D. E. L. How size and genetic diversity shape lifespan across breeds of purebred dogs. GeroScience 45, 627–643 (2023).
Google Scholar
Strand, P., Smith, F., John, N. & Reichman, B. How outdated perceptions have reshaped dog marketplace. Clin. Theriogenol. 11, 225–233 (2019).
Bir, C., Olynk Widmar, N. & Croney, C. Exploring social desirability bias in perceptions of dog adoption: All’s well that ends well? Or does the method of adoption matter?. Animals 8, 154 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rulli, T. For Dog’s Sake, Adopt! in (Oxford University Press, 2017).
Ostrander, E. A. Genetics and the Shape of Dogs: Studying the new sequence of the canine genome shows how tiny genetic changes can create enormous variation within a single species. Am. Sci. 95, 406–413 (2007).
Google Scholar
Morrill, K. et al. Ancestry-inclusive dog genomics challenges popular breed stereotypes. Science 376, eabk0639 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, G. E., Hare, B., Snyder-Mackler, N. & MacLean, E. L. Estimating the heritability of cognitive traits across dog breeds reveals highly heritable inhibitory control and communication factors. Anim. Cogn. 23, 953–964 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vaysse, A. et al. Identification of genomic regions associated with phenotypic variation between dog breeds using selection mapping. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002316 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hecht, E. E. et al. Neurodevelopmental scaling is a major driver of brain-behavior differences in temperament across dog breeds. Brain Struct. Funct. 226, 2725–2739 (2021).
Google Scholar
Farrell, L. L., Schoenebeck, J. J., Wiener, P., Clements, D. N. & Summers, K. M. The challenges of pedigree dog health: Approaches to combating inherited disease. Canine Genet. Epidemiol. 2, 3 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rose, D., McMillian, C. & Carter, O. Pet-friendly rental housing: Racial and spatial inequalities. Space Cult. 26, 116–129 (2023).
Google Scholar
Betancourt, M. Dog owners deserve public housing: Why Florida’s dog breed restrictions are discriminatory and should be repealed. St Thomas Law Rev. 35, 163 (2023).
Dickey, B. Pit Bull: The Battle over an American Icon (Alfred A. Knopf, 2016).
Olson, K. R. et al. Inconsistent identification of pit bull-type dogs by shelter staff. Vet. J. 206, 197–202 (2015).
Google Scholar
Voith, V. L., Ingram, E., Mitsouras, K. & Irizarry, K. Comparison of adoption agency breed identification and DNA breed identification of dogs. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 12, 253–262 (2009).
Google Scholar
Voith, V. L. et al. Comparison of visual and DNA breed identification of dogs and inter-observer reliability. Am. J. Sociol. Res. 3, 17–29 (2013).
Bennett, N. E., Mirabal Torres, S. E. & Gray, P. B. Exploratory content analysis of direct-to-consumer pet genomics: What is being marketed and what are consumers saying?. PLoS ONE 17, e0261694 (2022).
Google Scholar
Full access. JAVMA News. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 250, 580–603 (2017).
Dreger, D. L. et al. True Colors: Commercially-acquired morphological genotypes reveal hidden allele variation among dog breeds, informing both trait ancestry and breed potential. PLoS ONE 14, e0223995 (2019).
Google Scholar
Slavney, A. J. et al. Five genetic variants explain over 70% of hair coat pheomelanin intensity variation in purebred and mixed breed domestic dogs. PLoS ONE 16, e0250579 (2021).
Google Scholar
Deane-Coe, P. E., Chu, E. T., Slavney, A., Boyko, A. R. & Sams, A. J. Direct-to-consumer DNA testing of 6000 dogs reveals 98.6-kb duplication associated with blue eyes and heterochromia in Siberian Huskies. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007648 (2018).
Google Scholar
Thorsrud, J. A. & Huson, H. J. Description of breed ancestry and genetic health traits in arctic sled dog breeds. Canine Med. Genet. 8, 8 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sams, A. J. & Boyko, A. R. Fine-scale resolution of runs of homozygosity reveal patterns of inbreeding and substantial overlap with recessive disease genotypes in domestic dogs. G3 9, 117–123 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kawakami, T. et al. Early onset adult deafness in the Rhodesian Ridgeback dog is associated with an in-frame deletion in the EPS8L2 gene. PLoS ONE 17, e0264365 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hecht, E. E. et al. Significant neuroanatomical variation among domestic dog breeds. J. Neurosci. 39, 7748–7758 (2019).
Google Scholar
McMillan, K. M. et al. Longevity of companion dog breeds: those at risk from early death. Sci. Rep. 14, 531 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vonholdt, B. M. et al. Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature 464, 898–902 (2010).
Google Scholar
MacLean, E. L., Snyder-Mackler, N., vonHoldt, B. M. & Serpell, J. A. Highly heritable and functionally relevant breed differences in dog behaviour. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20190716 (2019).
Google Scholar
Creevy, K. E., Akey, J. M., Kaeberlein, M., Promislow, D. E. L., Dog Aging Project Consortium. An open science study of ageing in companion dogs. Nature 602, 51–57 (2022).
Google Scholar
Creevy, K. E. et al. 2019 AAHA canine life stage guidelines. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 55, 267–290 (2019).
Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey Office. Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/sahie/reference-maps/2019/us_regdiv.pdf.
Haid, M. Most popular dog breeds of 2022. American Kennel Club (2023).
McCoy, B. M. et al. Social determinants of health and disease in companion dogs: A cohort study from the Dog Aging Project. Evol. Med. Public Health 11, 187–201 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gunter, L. M., Barber, R. T. & Wynne, C. D. L. A canine identity crisis: Genetic breed heritage testing of shelter dogs. PLoS ONE 13, e0202633 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kratzer, T. B. et al. Lung cancer statistics, 2023. Cancer 130, 1330–1348 (2024).
Google Scholar
Woodruff, K. & Smith, D. R. An estimate of the number of dogs in US Shelters in 2015 and the factors affecting their fate. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 23, 302–314 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gunter, L. M., Barber, R. T. & Wynne, C. D. L. What’s in a name? Effect of breed perceptions & labeling on attractiveness, adoptions & length of stay for pit-bull-type dogs. PLoS ONE 11, e0146857 (2016).
Google Scholar
Goteiner, C. Breed-specific legislation. in Animals in the City 260–274 (Routledge, 2021).
Riem, P. Breed-Specific Dog Laws: Moving the United States Away from an Anti-Pit Bull Mentality. Journal of Animal and Natural Resource Law 14, 159–178 (2018).
Norfolk Terrier Dog Breed Information. American Kennel Club. https://www.akc.org/dog-breeds/norfolk-terrier/.
Rando, H. M., Graim, K., Hampikian, G. & Greene, C. S. Many direct-to-consumer canine genetic tests can identify the breed of purebred dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 262, 1–8 (2024).
Google Scholar
Majumder, M. A., Guerrini, C. J. & McGuire, A. L. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Value and risk. Annu. Rev. Med. 72, 151–166 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nolan, J. J. & Ormondroyd, E. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests providing health risk information: A systematic review of consequences for consumers and health services. Clin. Genet. 104, 3–21 (2023).
Google Scholar
Oliveri, S., Renzi, C., Masiero, M. & Pravettoni, G. Living at Risk: Factors that affect the experience of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Mayo Clin. Proc. 90, 1323–1326 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rubanovich, C. K. et al. Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing. J. Community Genet. 12, 37–52 (2021).
Google Scholar
Walajahi, H., Wilson, D. R. & Hull, S. C. Constructing identities: the implications of DTC ancestry testing for tribal communities. Genet. Med. 21, 1744–1750 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hendricks-Sturrup, R. M. & Lu, C. Y. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing data privacy: Key concerns and recommendations based on consumer perspectives. J. Pers. Med. 9, 25 (2019).
Google Scholar
Harris, P. A. et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform. 42, 377–381 (2009).
Google Scholar
Pearson, E. B. et al. Analysis of 2,570 responses to Dog Aging Project End of Life Survey demonstrates that euthanasia is associated with cause of death but not age. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 262, 1–10 (2024).
Google Scholar
McCoy, B. M. et al. Aging at scale: Younger dogs and larger breeds from the Dog Aging Project show accelerated epigenetic aging. bioRxiv (2024).
Google Scholar
Parker, H. G. et al. Genomic analyses reveal the influence of geographic origin, migration, and hybridization on modern dog breed development. Cell Rep. 19, 697–708 (2017).
Google Scholar
AKC Dog Breed Groups. Understanding Breed Groups at AKC Shows. (American Kennel Club, 2019).
link
More Stories
Most Popular Dog Breeds of the 1930s
Westminster Fun Facts You May Not Know
15 Fun Facts About Westminster’s Winningest Breeds